Broadly speaking, the Forerunner series is synonymous with high performance, targeting serious athletes and fitness-conscious individuals. On the other hand, the Venu 3 aims to strike a balance between lifestyle and fitness. It serves as Garmin’s answer to competitors such as the Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch.

With overlapping features and distinct advantages, choosing among Garmin devices can be a daunting task. Let’s delve into the specifics.

All three devices are available on Garmin’s website. You can also pick them up on Amazon (Venu 3, Forerunner 965, Forerunner 265).

Jump to:

Hardware & design
Technical specs
Battery life
Functionality
The bottom line

Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 965 vs 265: Hardware & design

Look & feel

When it comes to look and feel, each of these Garmin devices offers a unique aesthetic that aligns with its intended user base. The Forerunner 965, with its 47.1 x 47.1 x 13.2 mm dimensions and five physical buttons, is the largest of the bunch. It is designed for those who prefer a more substantial presence on the wrist. The watch packs a 1.4-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 454 x 454 pixels, providing crisp visuals. The case is made of fiber-reinforced polymer, and it’s paired with a silicone strap. This makes it both durable and comfortable for extended wear.

The Forerunner 265 and 265s have a similar design but they are slightly smaller. They offer a choice between a 46mm and 41mm fiber-reinforced case. The display size of the larger edition is 1.3 inches and of the smaller 1.1 inches.

Finally, the Venu 3, adds a touch of elegance with its stainless steel bezel. This makes it suitable for both fitness activities and casual wear. It comes in two sizes: 45 x 45 x 12 mm and 41 x 41 x 12 mm. The screen, once again, is an AMOLED with optional always-on mode. It comes in two resolutions: 454 x 454 pixels for the 1.4 inch and 390 x 390 pixels for the 1.2 inch edition.

All these devices are 5 ATM water-resistant. This makes them versatile choices for those who engage in water sports. The same applies for those who simply don’t want to worry about taking their watch off before a shower.

Under the hood

When it comes to internal specifications, all five models are equipped with a robust set of sensors. These include heart rate monitoring (Elevate 5 on Venu 3,3S), barometric altimeter, compass, gyroscope, accelerometer, thermometer, and SpO2. The Venu 3S distinguishes itself with an additional ECG sensor and most likely a skin temperature sensor. However, these two have not been enabled at the time of writing this article. But they most likely will in the months ahead.

All models share the same connectivity options, supporting Bluetooth, ANT+, and Wi-Fi. When it comes to satellite connectivity, the Forerunner 265, 265S, and 965 offer multi-frequency positioning for more accurate location tracking. The Venu 3 and Venu 3S, on the other hand, support standard GPS, GLONASS, and GALILEO.

Memory storage varies amongst the models. The Venu 3 and Forerunner 265 series offer 8GB of internal storage. In contrast, the Forerunner 965 provides a more generous 32GB, allowing for a larger music library. The watches are also compatible with Garmin Pay.

Technical specs

Here’s a table illustrating the technical specs differences.

Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 965 vs 265: Battery life comparison

The Forerunner 965 leads the pack in battery longevity. It conjures up to 23 days in smartwatch mode and 31 hours in GPS-only GNSS mode. It’s an ideal choice for those who require extended battery life for outdoor activities and sports. When music is in play, the device still offers up to 10.5 hours, making it versatile for various scenarios.

The Forerunner 265 and 265S offer a balanced profile. They dish up to 13 and 15 days in smartwatch mode and 20 and 24 hours in GPS-only GNSS mode.

In contrast, the Venu 3 and Venu 3S are lifestyle-oriented with up to 14 and 10 days in smartwatch mode, respectively. Both offer a battery saver mode that can significantly extend usage.

Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 965 vs Forerunner 265: Functionality

Fitness Tracking

The Garmin Venu 3, Forerunner 965, and Forerunner 265 are first and foremost fitness and sports watches. While they do offer some smartwatch functionalities, they are not designed to be direct competitors to devices like the Apple Watch. Instead, they excel in what they are primarily built for. All three models come with an array of features for fitness enthusiasts, from basic step counting and sleep tracking to advanced performance metrics.

The Forerunner series, in particular, is tailored for serious athletes. It offers a more comprehensive set of analytics, diving deep into various performance metrics that can be crucial for high-level training. On the other hand, the Venu 3 currently stands out for its unique features like Sleep Coach, nap detection, and Jet Lag advisor, which are not yet available on the Forerunner models. However, it’s worth noting that these features are likely to be rolled out to the Forerunner series through future firmware updates, further enhancing their capabilities.

Training, Planning and Analysis Features

It is no surprise, when it comes to training, planning, and analysis features, the Forerunner 965 and Forerunner 265 are the ones to go for. Both models offer a comprehensive set of metrics. Furthermore, Forerunner models offer features like “Heat and Altitude Acclimation,” “VO2 Max for Trail Run,” and “Realtime Stamina,” which are not available on the Venu 3.

And those are just a few example. The exhaustive list of differences can be seen below.

Running Features

In the domain of running features, the Forerunner 965 and 265 are tailored for serious runners, offering a comprehensive suite of advanced metrics not found in the Venu 3. These include “Running Dynamics,” “Vertical Oscillation and Ratio,” and “Stride Length in Real Time,” among others. These metrics provide in-depth insights into running form and efficiency, making the Forerunner models more suitable for those who are keen on optimizing their performance.

The Venu 3, while lacking in these advanced features, still offers basic run profiles like “Running, Treadmill Running, and Indoor Track Running.” It doesn’t provide the same level of granularity in running analytics as the Forerunners, making it more suited for casual runners or those who don’t require extensive data for training.

Furthermore, the Forerunner 965 and 265 models come equipped with dual-band satellite connectivity for more accurate and reliable tracking. This feature is particularly useful for athletes who often find themselves in challenging environments where GPS signals might be weak or obstructed. On the other hand, the Venu 3 offers a more basic GPS connectivity without the dual-band support, making it less reliable for tracking in complex terrains or dense urban areas.

Connectivity, payment and more

The Venu 3 and Forerunner 965 offer superior music storage, integrating seamlessly with Spotify and Deezer. All three models provide smartphone notifications, but the Venu 3 has the added advantage of displaying images from notifications for Android users. Additionally, Venu 3 is the only model that supports Bluetooth calling and voice assistant functionality.

While the Venu 3 offers a balanced set of smartwatch features suitable for everyday use, the Forerunner models are more specialized. They are tailored for serious athletes and outdoor enthusiasts, focusing on advanced tracking and navigation features. This specialization comes at the expense of some of the smartwatch conveniences found in the Venu 3.

Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 965 vs Forerunner 265: Final thoughts

Navigating Garmin’s latest offerings can be a complex task, given the nuanced differences and overlapping features among them. The Venu 3 is designed for those who seek a balanced, all-arounder that can handle both lifestyle and basic fitness tracking. It stands out for its smartwatch features, including Bluetooth calling and voice assistant capabilities. Plus there’s the ECG and skin temperature tracking which may be enabled at some point.

The Forerunner 265, on the other hand, is more focused on fitness and training. It offers a robust set of features that cater to athletes and fitness enthusiasts.

The 965, priced at $600, is the high-end option, targeting serious athletes who require all the advanced training metrics Garmin has on offer, along with long battery life. It justifies its higher price tag with a comprehensive set of specialized features, including advanced training, planning, and analysis options that are not available in the other two models. The Venu 3 and Forerunner 265, both priced at $450, offer a more budget-friendly set of features.

Essential reading: Best fitness trackers and health gadgets

If you’re looking for a device that offers a balanced set of features for both everyday use and fitness tracking, the Venu 3 is a strong contender. If your focus is more on rigorous training and fitness tracking, the Forerunner 265 offers a compelling package. Particularly for runners. For those who require the pinnacle of athletic tracking and are willing to invest in a premium device, the Forerunner 965 stands in a league of its own.

All three devices are available on Garmin’s website. You can also pick them up on Amazon (Venu 3, Forerunner 965, Forerunner 265).

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Garmin showdown: Venu 3 vs Forerunner 965 vs Forerunner 265 appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Released a few weeks prior, the Galaxy Watch 6 already included skin temperature tracking as a standard feature. This naturally led to speculation about whether and when its predecessor, the Galaxy Watch 5 and 5 Pro, would follow suit.

The Beta Phase: Honing in on skin temperature

We actually knew the feature would be enabled at some point. Skin temperature tracking had been in Beta testing since July, allowing Samsung to fine-tune its accuracy and gauge user response before a widespread launch.

Essential reading: Top fitness trackers and health gadgets

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 and 5 Pro now offer a nuanced approach to health monitoring by focusing on this additional metric during sleep. The feature, already present in competitor products from Fitbit and Whoop, enables users to spot deviations from their normal readings. Such insights serve as an early warning system for potential health concerns, assist in managing fitness routines, and offer personalized health advice.

Cycle Tracking: Distinct yet complementary

Last spring, Samsung rolled out a fully functional cycle tracking feature for women. Created in partnership with Natural Cycles, this feature leverages the watch’s infrared sensors to provide menstrual cycle insights. Info includes predictions for fertile windows and period start dates.

The feature has been designed to offer a user-friendly experience. To this end it comes with intuitive interfaces and easy-to-understand visualizations, making it accessible for individuals regardless of their familiarity with menstrual cycle tracking.

While the feature itself is distinct, it complements other health metrics monitored by the Galaxy Watch 5 range, such as heart rate and sleep patterns. What’s more, the successful deployment of cycle tracking showcased the versatility of the watch’s sensors, paving the way for additional features like skin temperature monitoring.

What’s new: The evolution beyond Beta

The skin temperature monitoring has now started rolling out to users of the Galaxy Watch 5 and 5 Pro. To enable the feature, make sure all your software is up to date. Then you need to navigate to the Health app on the watch. Once inside the app, the option for skin temperature monitoring should be visible, allowing you to activate the feature. It should be a straightforward process.

The rollout of skin temperature tracking on the Galaxy Watch 5 and 5 Pro signals Samsung’s intent to keep its older models relevant. Although the Galaxy Watch 6 had an initial advantage, the Galaxy Watch 5 range is catching up. It has come well after the watch’s initial unveiling – but better late than never!

While initial reactions to the feature have been mostly positive, its practical utility remains a subject of discussion. Is this feature a meaningful addition to health monitoring, or merely another bullet point on the spec sheet? As more users engage with this feature, its long-term value and utility will become clearer.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out

The post Samsung Galaxy Watch 5: Skin temperature feature now fully operational appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

We wrote a few months ago about a device we spotted on the FCC website – Zepp Clarity Pixie. It appeared as it would be another addition to Zepp’s innovative earphone range, which includes the Amazfit Powerbuds Pro and ZenBuds. These earphones were lauded for their unique health and wellness features, such as heart rate and posture monitoring. However, Zepp Health has surprised us all. The Zepp Clarity Pixie is not a pair of headphones but a smart hearing aid.

Essential reading: Best fitness trackers and health gadgets

The company has been primarily focused on smartwatches and fitness trackers. Its pivot to hearing aids marks a significant shift in its product portfolio. One could speculate that this move is an attempt to diversify and tap into the growing market for health technology solutions that are not wrist-worn. The ear’s unique physiology makes it an excellent site for health monitoring, offering a new frontier for Zepp Health to explore.

Zepp Clarity Pixie: Not just another earphone

The Zepp Clarity Pixie is an advanced hearing aid priced at $1,199. It’s ultra-compact, weighing just 1.1g per bud, and comes with a breathable medical-grade silicone dome. The device is IP-X7 waterproof and offers a 2-year warranty. It also boasts a 17-hour built-in rechargeable battery, with an additional two weeks of power through its wireless charging case.

The device offers multi-scenario modes, including “Clarity Boost” for clear voice comprehension and ambient noise cancellation. It’s fully customizable, allowing users to switch between profiles without removing the hearing aid. The gizmo also integrates seamlessly with smartphones and tablets via Bluetooth, offering smart call notifications directly from the hearing aids.

Future prospects

Introduced in 2022, the FDA’s Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act has made hearing aids more accessible and affordable. This could be a strategic move for Zepp Health, who may be looking to position themselves at the forefront of the OTC smart hearing aid market.

The FDA estimates that the regulatory changes could lower the average costs of hearing aids by as much as $3,000 per pair, offering significant financial relief to users. The cost reduction is achieved by eliminating the need for a prescription, exam, or audiologist fitting. This regulaton allows adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss to purchase hearing aids directly in stores or online, thereby increasing accessibility and reducing overall costs.

Zepp Health is already one of the global leaders in smart wearables. The introduction of the Zepp Clarity Pixie could be a stepping stone to an integrated wellness health technology solution, connecting hearing aids to Amazfit smartwatches via Zepp OS.

The company’s foray into the smart hearing aid market with the Zepp Clarity Pixie is a surprising but strategic move. It not only diversifies their product range but also taps into a growing market, fueled by regulatory changes and technological advancements. Only time will tell how this pivot will impact Zepp Health’s position in the competitive landscape of health technology.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Zepp Health’s unexpected pivot: From smartwatches to smart hearing aids appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

But as with any set of siblings, the devil is in the details—or in this case, the sensors. While they all share the family traits of heart rate monitoring and GPS navigation, not all the siblings are equally gifted. So, if you’re looking to find out which of these high-tech wrist ornaments best suits your adventurous or fitness-focused lifestyle, you’ve come to the right place. Let’s dive into the nitty-gritty and separate the prodigies from the merely proficient.

All three watches can be purchased on Garmin’s website and Amazon.

Jump to

Hardware & design
Technical specs
Battery life
Functionality
The bottom line

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 2 vs 2 Plus: Hardware & design

Look & feel

When it comes to wearables, the materials used are more than just a sum of their parts; they define the very essence of the device. The Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus sport a stainless-steel bezel that exudes a sense of premium sophistication. It’s the kind of material that says, “I mean business, but I also know how to have a good time.” On the other hand, the Vivoactive 5 opts for an anodised aluminium bezel, offering a more understated elegance. It’s lighter and gives off a sporty vibe. This makes it the go-to choice for those who prefer a more casual look.

The first thing you’ll notice when you strap one of these devices onto your wrist is the weight. The Venu 2, tipping the scales at 49 grams, feels substantial without being burdensome. It’s a wearable that lets you know it’s there, in a reassuring way. The Venu 2 Plus takes it a notch higher at 51 grams, adding just that extra bit of gravitas. In contrast, the Vivoactive 5 is a featherweight champion at just 36 grams. It’s so light you might forget you’re wearing it, making it ideal for those who want a near-invisible companion on their fitness journey.

At this point its also worth mentioning that there’s a Venu 2S version. So you can take a pick of different size options for that one. The S model comes in a 40mm case size, the other one comes in at 45mm. In this article we focus on the larger edition. As far as Vivoactive 5 and Venu 2 Plus, they fall somewhere between these two size options.

AMOLED display on all three

The display is where you’ll spend most of your time interacting with these devices, and each timepiece offers a unique visual experience. The Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus boast a 1.3-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 416 x 416 pixels. The colors are vibrant, and the blacks are deep, making every notification and fitness metric pop. The Vivoactive 5, while featuring a slightly smaller 1.2-inch AMOLED display with a 390 x 390-pixel resolution, doesn’t lag far behind. Its display is crisp and clear, offering an excellent visual experience in various lighting conditions.

Let’s talk about physical buttons. The Venu 2 Plus distinguishes itself with three of them, offering additional functionality but at the expense of a slightly more complex interface. In contrast, both the Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus come equipped with just two physical buttons. So something to be aware of.

While all three devices offer quick-release bands, their sizes differ. The Venu 2 opts for a 22 mm industry-standard size, while the Vivoactive 5 and Venu 2 Plus go for a slightly narrower 20 mm. This subtle difference could influence your choice if you’re looking to customize your device with third-party bands.

In terms of water-resistance, the trio comes with a 5 ATM water resistance rating. This makes them equally adept at handling your sweat-drenched workouts or spontaneous cannonballs into the pool.

Under the hood

All three devices come equipped with Garmin’s core technologies, including the Elevate wrist heart rate monitor. This is coupled with a Pulse Ox blood oxygen saturation monitor, and built-in compass. They also support multiple global navigation satellite systems like GPS, GLONASS, and GALILEO, and feature an accelerometer and ambient light sensor. These shared technologies form the backbone of each device, providing a robust suite of health and navigation features that cater to a wide range of user needs.

As far as differences, the Vivoactive 5 lacks a barometric altimeter and gyroscope, both of which are present in the other two. This makes the Venu models more suitable for activities like hiking or winter sports.

The Venu 2 Plus breaks away from its siblings by incorporating a ECG sensor. This advanced feature allows for more in-depth heart health monitoring, making the Venu 2 Plus a compelling choice for those who are keen on comprehensive cardiovascular tracking.

It is also the only of the three to feature a built-in speaker and microphone. This feature transforms the device from a mere fitness tracker to a more interactive gadget, capable of handling calls and potentially voice-activated tasks.

Last but not least, let’s mention memory. With 8 GB of storage, the Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus offer ample space for your apps, music, and other data. The Vivoactive 5, although coming in at 4 GB, still provides sufficient room for essential apps and functionalities.

Technical specs

Here’s a table showing the differences in technical specs between the three devices.

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 2 vs 2 Plus: Battery life differences

All three devices offer impressive battery longevity in smartwatch mode, with the Vivoactive 5 and Venu 2 leading the pack at up to 11 days. The Venu 2 Plus trails slightly at up to 9 days, which is still commendable.

The Vivoactive 5 takes the crown in battery saver mode, boasting up to 21 days of battery life. The Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus offer up to 12 and 10 days, respectively, which are respectable figures but fall short of the Vivoactive 5’s performance.

When it comes to GPS functionality, the Venu 2 Plus offers the longest GPS mode without music at up to 24 hours. This is followed closely by the Venu 2 at 22 hours. The Vivoactive 5 offers multiple GPS modes, including a GPS-only GNSS mode that lasts up to 21 hours and an all-systems GNSS mode that can go for up to 17 hours.

Both the Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus offer up to 8 hours of GPS mode with music, aligning them closely in terms of multimedia capabilities. The Vivoactive 5 also offers up to 8 hours but in its all-systems GNSS mode with music.

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 2 vs 2 Plus: Functionality

Fitness & health tracking

When it comes to health monitoring, the Vivoactive 5 takes the lead in offering meditation, sleep coaching, and nap detection features, which are absent in the Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus. However, the Venu 2 Plus stands out with its ECG sensor, providing a more comprehensive cardiovascular tracking option. In the realm of activity tracking, the Vivoactive 5 offers unique features like push tracker and weight shift alert, while both the Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus have the capability to track floors climbed.

In terms of gym and fitness equipment, all three devices offer a wide range of activity profiles, but the Venu models include additional options like breathwork. The Vivoactive 5 is the only device to offer workouts specifically designed for wheelchair users. When it comes to training and planning, the Vivoactive 5 again takes the lead with features like recovery time, HRV status, and interval training. Both Venu models lack these features but partially make up for it with on-screen workout animations, which the Vivoactive 5 lacks.

Smart functionality

The Vivoactive 5 excels in smart features, offering an on-device Connect IQ Store, the ability to view images from Android notifications, and a morning report feature. It also syncs settings in real-time with Garmin Connect Mobile. The Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus fall short in these areas but have a unique offering: the Venu 2 Plus supports Bluetooth phone calling and voice assistant, a feature not available in the other two models.

Functionality comparison table

Functionality/Features	Vivoactive 5	Venu 2	Venu 2 Plus
Health Monitoring
Meditation	Yes	No	No
Sleep Coach	Yes	No	No
Nap Detection	Yes	No	No
ECG	No	No	Yes
Daily Smart Features
On-Device Connect IQ Store	Yes	No	No
View Images from Notifications (Android Only)	Yes	No	No
Morning Report	Yes	No	No
Realtime Settings Sync with Garmin Connect Mobile	Yes	No	No
Bluetooth Phone Calling and Voice Assistant Support	No	No	Yes
Activity Tracking Features
Push Tracker	Yes	No	No
Weight Shift Alert	Yes	No	No
Floors Climbed	No	Yes	Yes
Fitness Equipment/Gym
Available Gym Activity Profiles	Strength, HIIT, Cardio, Elliptical Training, Stair Stepping, Indoor Rowing, Pilates, Yoga	Strength, Cardio, HIIT, Elliptical Training, Stair Stepping, Floor Climbing, Indoor Rowing, Yoga, Pilates, Breathwork	Strength, Cardio, HIIT, Elliptical Training, Stair Stepping, Floor Climbing, Indoor Rowing, Yoga, Pilates, Breathwork
Workouts for Wheelchair Users	Yes	No	No
On-Screen Workout Animations	No	Yes	Yes
Training, Planning and Analysis Features
Recovery Time	Yes	No	No
HRV Status	Yes	No	No
Respiration Rate (During Exercise)	Yoga, breathwork, meditation	Yoga, breathwork	Yoga, breathwork
Interval Training	Yes	No	No
Improved Interval	Yes	No	No
Workout Benefit	Yes	No	No
Improved Recovery Time	Yes	No	No
Audio Prompts	Yes	No	No
Outdoor Recreation
Available Outdoor Recreation Profiles	Skiing, Snowboarding, XC Classic Skiing, Snowshoeing, Stand Up Paddleboarding, Rowing, Tennis, Padel, Disc Golf	Hiking, Indoor Climbing, Bouldering, Skiing, Snowboarding, XC Skiing, Stand Up Paddleboarding, Rowing	Hiking, Indoor Climbing, Bouldering, Skiing, Snowboarding, XC Skiing, Stand Up Paddleboarding, Rowing
Total Ascent/Descent	No	Yes	Yes
Swimming Features
Open-Water Swim Metrics	Yes	No	No
Auto Rest (Pool Swim Only)	Yes	No	No

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 3 vs Venu 3s: The bottom line – navigating the Garmin Maze

The Garmin Vivoactive 5, Venu 2, and Venu 2 Plus are comparable to a set of siblings, each endowed with distinct capabilities and idiosyncrasies. They serve as Garmin’s counter to competitors like the Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch, offering a wide array of features from health metrics with some smartwatch functionalities sprinkled in. However, when you delve into the specifics, each device reveals its own advantages and limitations that could sway your choice.

Essential reading: Best fitness trackers and health gadgets

When it comes to value for money, the Vivoactive 5, priced at $299.99, stands out as the most cost-effective option. It excels in health and fitness tracking, boasting unique features such as meditation, sleep coaching, and nap detection. And let’s not forget recovery time, HRV status and other training and planning goodies.

Meanwhile, the Venu 2 and Venu 2 Plus, priced at $399.99 and $449.99 respectively, also offer a broad range of features, including ECG monitoring and Bluetooth phone calling in the case of the Venu 2 Plus. However, given the price points, the Venu 2 has lost some of its allure, especially when compared to its siblings. If you happen to find the Venu 2 or Venu 2 Plus at a discounted rate, they could become more appealing options. But for now, if you’re seeking a device that offers a comprehensive set of features without breaking the bank, the Vivoactive 5 is likely your best bet.

All three watches can be purchased on Garmin’s website and Amazon.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 2 vs 2 Plus: A battle of features & build appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Now, here’s where it gets juicy. The AMOLED display was the secret sauce that used to set the Venu series apart from the Vivoactive lineup. With the Vivoactive 5 adopting this feature, it’s like watching a plot twist in a thriller movie. Is the Vivoactive 5 trying to be a Venu 3 doppelgänger, or is it carving out its own identity? The lines are blurring, and the choice between these models just got a whole lot more interesting. So, buckle up as we dissect these Garmin offerings to help you make sense of it all.

All three watches can be purchased on Garmin’s website and Amazon.

Jump to

Hardware & design
Technical specs
Battery life
Functionality
The bottom line

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 3 vs 3s: Hardware & design

The screen showdown: Pixels, inches, and all that jazz

Let’s talk screens, shall we? If you’re a pixel peeper, listen up. The Venu 3 struts in with a 1.4″ display and a resolution of 454 x 454 pixels. It’s like the 4K TV of smartwatches. On the other hand, the Vivoactive 5 and Venu 3S share the same 1.2″ screen with a 390 x 390-pixel resolution. They’re not slouches, but next to the Venu 3, they’re more like the supporting cast.

Now, onto the wrist-hugging dimensions. The Vivoactive 5 is your middle-of-the-road option, measuring 42.2 x 42.2 x 11.1 mm and fitting wrists from 125-190 mm. The Venu 3 is the big kahuna, sizing up at 45 x 45 x 12 mm and wrapping around wrists from 135-200 mm. The Venu 3S is the petite contender at 41 x 41 x 12 mm, perfect for those with wrists between 110-175 mm. As for the bling factor, the Venu 3 and 3S flaunt stainless steel bezels, while the Vivoactive 5 opts for a less impressive anodized aluminum. Choose your style, choose your statement.

Interestingly, Vivoactive 5 has only two physical buttons. You will find three on the Venu 3 range.

All three models come with a 5 ATM water resistance rating. So, whether you’re doing the dishes, caught in a downpour, or taking a quick dip, these watches won’t throw in the towel.

So, there you have it. Whether you’re all about that display, have a penchant for size, or just want to talk to your wrist like a secret agent, there’s something here for everyone.

Under the hood: Where the real magic happens

Let’s get to the core—heart rate sensors. The Vivoactive 5 is rocking the Elevate sensor version 4. It’s reliable, but think of it as the seasoned actor who’s been in the game for a while. On the flip side, the Venu 3 and Venu 3S are flaunting the shiny new Elevate sensor version 5. It’s like the hot new starlet everyone’s talking about. So, if you’re after the latest and greatest in heart rate monitoring, the Venu models have the edge.

The newer sensor is also hardware-capable of ECG. It remains to be seen if Garmin turns it on via a firmware update. Most likely, this will happen at some point. There’s also talk the Venu 3 line is capable of skin temperature measurements. But just like ECG, this is not functional at the moment.

When it comes to memory, size does matter. The Vivoactive 5 offers 4 GB of storage, enough for your apps, music, and workout data. But hold onto your hats, because the Venu 3 and Venu 3S double that with a whopping 8 GB. That’s like going from a studio apartment to a two-bedroom flat—more room for all your digital belongings. Also there are differences when it comes to mic and speaker – but more about that later.

Technical specs

Here’s a table illustrating the technical specs differences between the three devices. It’s a real mix.

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 3 vs 3s: Battery life comparison

The battery life of the Garmin Vivoactive 5, Venu 3, and Venu 3S models varies a bit, offering different advantages depending on your usage needs. The Venu 3 stands out for its extended battery life in almost all modes. In smartwatch mode, it can last up to 14 days, compared to Vivoactive 5’s 11 days and Venu 3S’s 10 days. All three models offer a 5-day display always-on feature, but the Venu 3 takes the lead in the Battery Saver Smartwatch mode, boasting up to 26 days, while the Vivoactive 5 and Venu 3S offer up to 21 and 20 days, respectively.

When it comes to GPS functionality, the Venu 3 again outperforms its counterparts. It offers up to 26 hours in GPS-Only GNSS mode, compared to the 21 hours provided by both the Vivoactive 5 and Venu 3S. In the All-Systems GNSS mode, the Venu 3 offers up to 20 hours, while the Vivoactive 5 and Venu 3S lag behind with 17 and 15 hours, respectively. If you’re planning to use the All-Systems GNSS mode with music, the Venu 3 offers up to 11 hours, whereas both the Vivoactive 5 and Venu 3S offer up to 8 hours. Overall, the Venu 3 is the clear winner if battery longevity is a priority for you.

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 3 vs 3s: Functionality

When it comes to fitness and health tracking, the Vivoactive 5, Venu 3, and Venu 3S are not just about counting steps or monitoring heart rates. They bring in a lot of features.

This includes nap tracking and sleep coaching. Interestingly, despite the Vivoactive 5 sporting the older Elevate 4 heart rate sensor, it still conjures up these features. This offers hope for owners of other Garmin models with the same sensor, as it suggests that these features could potentially be rolled out via firmware updates. Until the launch of Vivoactive 5, these advanced sleep features were exclusive to the Venu 3 and 3S.

Worth a mention is that Vivoactive 5 lacks an altimeter. This means when it comes to climbing stairs or hills, the Venu models also track floors climbed, while the Vivoactive 5 sits this one out.

Jet Lag Advisor

Jet setters, take note: the Venu 3 and Venu 3S come with a Jet Lag Adviser, a feature missing in the Vivoactive 5. This offers personalized insights to help you adjust to local time more efficiently.

The feature provides scientifically grounded advice on when to seek or avoid light, how to schedule sleep and exercise, and even offers additional insights into nutrition, naps, and caffeine use. Simply add your trip to your calendar, and the Jet Lag Adviser will provide tailored advice in the days leading up to your trip, during your journey, and for your return home.

The Visuals, activity support and more

If you’re the type who needs a visual nudge, the Venu 3 and Venu 3S offer on-screen workout animations. The Vivoactive 5 keeps it old school with no animations. For outdoor enthusiasts, the Venus are better equipped for winter sports and hiking due to the addition of the altimeter.

For those who like to get into the weeds, the Venu 3 and Venu 3S track total ascent and descent and are compatible with power meters. The Vivoactive 5 doesn’t offer these metrics. When it comes to making a splash, all three models support pool swimming, but the Venu models take it a step further with open water swimming profiles.

Finally, the Venu 3 line takes connectivity to the next level with its built-in microphone and normal speaker, allowing for voice calls directly from the wrist. This feature elevates the smartwatch from a mere notification center to a fully functional communication device, making it easier to stay connected without having to reach for your phone. On the other hand, the Vivoactive 5 keeps it simple with just a beeper, which means it can alert you to incoming calls and messages but won’t let you answer them directly from the device.

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 3 vs Venu 3s: The bottom line – navigating the Garmin Maze

Garmin’s latest offerings—Vivoactive 5, Venu 3, and Venu 3S—present a diverse range of options, each with its own set of merits. If cutting-edge technology is your priority, the Venu 3 models are your best bet. They come equipped with the latest Elevate sensor version 5, an altimeter, and a host of advanced features like the Jet Lag Adviser, on-screen workout animations and ability to take smartphone calls. Think of them as the multi-tools in Garmin’s arsenal. In the coming months, they’ll probably get the ability to take ECGs and monitor skin temperature at night.

But let’s not sideline the Vivoactive 5. Priced at $299 at garmin.com, it offers a much more budget-friendly alternative to the $499 Venu 3 series, without skimping on essential features.

Essential reading: Best fitness trackers and health gadgets

The Venu 3 is clearly the endurance athlete of the group, boasting a larger display and superior battery life. If you’re in the market for something more compact, the Venu 3S should be on your radar. It offers a similar feature set but in a smaller package.

Then there’s the Vivoactive 5, the jack-of-all-trades. It provides a balanced mix of features and form, making it the choice for those who want a well-rounded experience without the need for every high-end feature. One notable change is its switch from MIP to AMOLED display technology—a move that will delight some but might not be everyone’s cup of tea.

All three watches can be purchased on Garmin’s website and Amazon.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Decoding the Garmin trio: Vivoactive 5 vs Venu 3 vs 3S appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

What we know so far

It has been more than three years since the release of Fitbit Charge 5. It was launched on August 25th 2021, to be exact.

The Charge 6 is rumoured to look very similar to its predecessor. The one important difference is that the fitness band is expected to bring back the physical button. As far as the teaser, the device that can be spotted looks almost identical to Charge 5, supporting the notion that this could be an updated edition. Hard to spot whether there’s a physical button, though. The integration of Google services, including YouTube Music for playback controls and Maps navigation, is also expected to be a key selling point of the upcoming device.

Luxe 2: The dark horse

However, let’s not discount the possibility of a Fitbit Luxe 2. A new fitness band has been registered with the FCC recently and IMDA, and it could very well be the Luxe 2. The Luxe range is known for its elegance and customization options. Major changes in health functionality are unlikely. But we might see additions such as an altimeter or a low-end version of the EDA sensor for stress monitoring.

The new Fitbit app: more than just a facelift

But that’s not all.

Fitbit is also starting to roll out its redesigned smartphone app. The software aims to streamline the user experience emphasizing simplicity, personalization, and motivation.

The new layout will feature three main tabs: “Today,” which offers a comprehensive and customizable overview of health metrics; “Coach,” a motivational tool offering curated workouts and mindfulness sessions; and “You,” a hub for personal achievements and goal-setting. This redesign is part of Fitbit’s broader strategy to integrate more closely with its parent company, Google.

Having said this, it is clear the company is gradually phasing out the Fitbit brand in favour of Google. This is evidenced by the upcoming requirement for users to log in to Fitbit apps with Google credentials. Despite these changes, Fitbit assures that the redesign won’t affect which features are free and which are for premium subscribers.

Essential reading: Top fitness trackers and health gadgets

To further pique interest, Fitbit has released a YouTube video that showcases the app’s new design.

Final thoughts

The rollout of Fitbit’s new app is impeccably timed. It comes just days before the company’s mysterious hardware announcement on September 28 and the Google Pixel Watch 2 reveal on October 4th. This strategic move suggests that Fitbit is setting the stage for a more integrated ecosystem.

Fitbit has been relatively quiet on the hardware front this year. To make matters worse, the software changes have sometimes consisted of stripping back existing functionality. The new app could signal a shift in this trend, possibly laying the groundwork for more advanced features that will be introduced with the new hardware.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Fitbit’s September 28 mystery launch: Unpacking the tease appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The AMOLED advantage

The most eye-catching feature—literally—is the AMOLED display. Unlike the Standard Edition’s transflective memory-in-pixel (MIP) screen, the AMOLED version offers a more colorful and higher-resolution readout. It’s not just about looking good; this display is designed to be easily visible in sunlight and can dim down to a single nit for those stealthy night ops.

And if you are worried about burn in with an always on display? Garmin uses pixel-shifting tech and it avoids staying on the same lit pixels. This helps to avoid any burn in.

Garmin is clearly on a mission to shift all their watch ranges to AMOLED. Not everyone is a fan of this, and those who prefer MIP screens will be disappointed if the tech is ultimately dropped.

A matter of weight

The AMOLED Edition weighs 96 grams, which is slightly heavier than the Standard Edition’s 89 grams. It is also a bit thicker. In the realm of tactical smartwatches, these differences are a straightforward specification to consider. The variance is minimal but could be a deciding factor for those who prioritize a lighter and thinner device for extended wear or specific activities.

Power considerations

When it comes to battery life, both the AMOLED and Standard Editions conjure up to 89 hours in GPS mode. However, the AMOLED Edition provides up to 31 days in smartwatch mode with 11 days in always-on mode, while the Standard Edition offers up to 28 days in smartwatch mode. The battery performance is quite comparable, but the AMOLED Edition edges out slightly in smartwatch mode.

Red Shift Mode: A visionary feature

The AMOLED Edition introduces a unique Red Shift mode, which alters the entire interface to shades of red. This innovative feature minimizes the constriction of pupils caused by other colors of light, allowing for better night vision. A quick glance at the watch in this mode won’t compromise your ability to see in low-light conditions, making it a valuable addition for nocturnal activities or operations. Feel free to combine this with the built-in white and green flashlight which illuminate the dark.

Feature frenzy

As far as functionality differences between the MIP and AMOLED editions, there is little to write about. Both editions are brimming with features, but the AMOLED Edition takes it up a notch. It offers phone-free text messaging and connected GPS—features absent in the Standard Edition. And for the gamers out there, the AMOLED Edition is GameOn app compatible. And that’s about it.

Essential reading: Top fitness trackers and health gadgets

Here’s a tech specs comparison on the differences between the Tactic 7 AMOLED and Standard editions. You can check out both watches on Garmin’s website. At $1,399.99, the AMOLED version will cost you an extra $200.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED Edition: Tactical meets trendy appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The science of heart rate measurement

Both smart rings and smartwatches predominantly use a technology called photoplethysmography (PPG) to measure heart rate. In this method, a light source, usually an LED, shines light onto the skin. A sensor then measures the amount of light that is scattered back.

The principle behind this is that blood absorbs light, and every time the heart pumps, more blood flows through the vessels, causing more light to be absorbed. The fluctuations in the returned light are then analyzed to determine the heart rate.

Challenges in high-intensity activities for smart rings

Many smart rings will attempt to track your heart rate during exercise. Examples include the Oura Ring, RingConn and Ultrahuman Ring Air. Some of these even have a dedicated workout mode.

Unfortunately, you will find that this type of data is often inaccurate. Smart rings are simply not cut out for exercise tracking. There are a number of reasons for this.

The issue of increased motion

During high-intensity workouts, the rapid movement of hands or fingers can introduce ‘noise’ into the PPG signal. This noise makes it difficult to accurately measure heart rate. In contrast, smartwatches are less susceptible to such noise as there is less movement on the wrist.

A snug fit can improve the reliability of heart rate measurements. It minimises the ‘noise’ caused by rapid movements and may also reduce the impact of sweat on the PPG signal. However, this is more of a workaround than a solution, as it still doesn’t make smart rings as reliable as smartwatches for exercise tracking.

The complexity of blood flow dynamics

Strenuous exercise alters the dynamics of blood flow in the body. These changes can affect the clarity of the PPG signal, making it challenging for smart rings to provide accurate heart rate data. This is less of an issue for smartwatches.

The interference of perspiration

Sweat can refract light differently, complicating the PPG signal further. While this is a challenge for all wearables using PPG, smartwatches often have additional sensors that can compensate for these inaccuracies.

The impact of sampling rate

Another, little mentioned, factor affecting the performance of smart rings in exercise tracking is the sampling rate. This refers to how often the device collects data.

Due to their smaller form factor, smart rings have limited battery capacity compared to smartwatches. To extend battery life, manufacturers may opt to reduce the sampling rate. This compromises the accuracy of heart rate measurements, especially during high-intensity activities where rapid fluctuations in heart rate occur. In contrast, smartwatches, with their larger batteries, can afford to have higher sampling rates, thereby providing more accurate and timely data.

Final thoughts

A leap forward would be the ability for smart rings to connect to external heart rate monitors. This would allow for more accurate data collection during high-intensity activities, bypassing the limitations of the ring’s built-in sensors. However, no such devices currently exist on the market.

Essential reading: The best smart rings – health tracking from your finger

So if you are purchasing a smart ring, make sure you know why. These types of devices excel at recovery and sleep tracking. Many of them also do a decent job when it comes to steps and basic activity tracking.

However, smart rings are currently not the ideal for tracking strenuous exercise. Until they can either overcome the inherent challenges of monitoring such activities or offer connectivity with external heart rate monitors, smartwatches will remain the go-to choice for comprehensive exercise tracking.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post The unspoken limitations of smart rings in exercise tracking appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Launched in China a few weeks ago, the Oppo Watch 4 Pro introduces a range of advanced health tracking features that set it apart from its predecessor. While the older Watch 3 Pro model offered standard sensors like accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, compass, barometer, and blood oxygen, the Watch 4 Pro takes it a step further. It comes equipped with 8-channel heart rate, 16-channel blood oxygen, wrist temperature, and ECG sensors.

Essential reading: Top fitness trackers and health gadgets

The Watch 4 Pro aims to offer a smartphone-like experience with its improved memory and performance. It comes with 2GB of operational memory and 32GB of storage. This is a significant upgrade from the 1GB RAM in the Watch 3 Pro. In terms of battery life, the device packs a 570mAh battery, slightly more than the 550mAh in its predecessor. The device promises a battery life of up to two weeks with light usage and fully charges in just over an hour. This makes it a reliable choice for users who prioritize longevity.

Now details have emerged of another Oppo watch in the making.

The Mystery Device: Oppo Watch 4 (round) or Oppo Watch X?

New info from a tipster going by the name MlgmXyysd has added a layer of intrigue to Oppo’s smartwatch lineup. The leaker suggests that Oppo is developing a new smartwatch featuring a round display. The upcoming device is expected to feature a dual-chip system, similar to the Watch 4 Pro, that includes the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 and the BES 2700.

In terms of features, the speculative list is quite extensive. The device is anticipated to come with a double button and a crown, adding to its functional design. Health tracking features like an ECG and a blood oxygen tracker are also expected. As is a colorful Always-On Display (AOD). Additional functionalities like fist clench gestures and eSIM support round out what could be a highly versatile smartwatch.

As mentioned, this could be Oppo Watch Round. However, there is another possibility. The leaker states that the marketing name of the upcoming device is not actually known. And that these specs could be referring to the rumoured Opposite Watch X. This is a timepiece which may launch alongside the Opposite Reno 11 series in November.

Final thoughts

This takes us back to a design patent filed by Oppo for a smartwatch with a circular case and a 3D curved display. The filing, made public in September 2020, showcased three distinct designs: one similar to the existing Oppo Watch lineup, another with a square display aimed at slender wrists, and a third, more intriguing design featuring a 3D curved display and a crown. The patent confirms that Oppo is, indeed, exploring different form factors for its smartwatches.

Both the Oppo Watch 4 Pro and the mysterious new device are reportedly gearing up for a global launch. The Watch 4 Pro is likely to run on WearOS for its global release, while the round-dial smartwatch could carry the OnePlus branding in international markets.

Oppo’s foray into the smartwatch market is noteworthy. The Oppo Watch 4 Pro is a device that builds on its predecessor’s strengths, while the leaked round-dial smartwatch could be a shift in direction. How these devices will compete in a market saturated with options remains to be seen.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Oppo’s mysterious round-dial smartwatch: What we know appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

An earlier product listing discovered on a Brunei-based retail website suggests a mid-October launch in Europe. While the Vantage V2 set a high bar with its performance in areas like heart rate monitoring, GPS, and recovery metrics, the V3 is expected to push these boundaries further.

As first revealed on Reddit, the most recent leak comes from Polar’s Mexican website, where the Vantage V3 is listed at a price of 13,339 Mexican Pesos. This translates to around 550 USD after making adjustments for different countries’ pricing strategies.

This new info is particularly noteworthy because it comes from a regional website of the brand itself. This adds a significant level of credibility to the information. While still unconfirmed by Polar’s official channels, the Mexican website leak has fuelled discussions and speculations within the community.

Polar Vantage V3 features, pics

It seems Vantage V3 will offer some nice upgrades. This includes advanced measurement capabilities, design enhancements, offline maps and more. You can also see a few unofficial images. All of these have been posted on Reddit and are hosted on the social media platform. If they are removed, they will disappear from this article.

Advanced measurement capabilities

The Polar Vantage V3 is rumored to feature something called Polar Elixir. This a new measurement technology that promises to offer a unique combination of advanced biosensors. These will measure a variety of metrics, including enhanced detection of OHR (Optical Heart Rate), ECG (Electrocardiogram), SpO2 (Oxygen Saturation), and skin temperature. This aligns with Polar’s history of focusing on comprehensive health metrics.

This new info sheds light on a previously discovered trademark. Polar Elixir was registered with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) a few months ago. It was filed under two NICE Classes: 09 for scientific and electric apparatus and instruments, and 10 for medical apparatus and instruments. We initially suspected that Polar Elixir could be a new product line, but it seems not.

Display, design, and durability

The device comes with a 1.39-inch AMOLED display which boasts a sharp 462 ppi and is protected by curved Gorilla Glass 3. This makes it not only visually appealing but also durable, a crucial factor for a device meant to be worn during physical activities. Having said that, the bezel area around the display seems a bit large.

Battery life and power saving

The Vantage V3 will reportedly offer a long battery life, providing up to 53 hours of training time on a single charge. Additionally, it has a power-saving mode that can extend the training time to approximately 140 hours or around six days. These are nice figures which should offer flexibility for users who may not have frequent access to charging.

Offline maps and navigation

The device is also rumoured to feature offline maps powered by dual-frequency GPS. This is a first for Polar and could be particularly important for those who require reliable navigation in the great outdoors.

Given the advanced features and the high, yet unconfirmed, price point, the Polar Vantage V3 seems to be targeting a more dedicated user base. Whether it’s worth the investment will largely depend on individual needs and how one plans to utilize the extensive features. Until Polar makes an official announcement, all we can do is wait, watch and speculate.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Polar Vantage V3: What the leaks reveal about the anticipated watch appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.